source : yahoo.com

## Justify the last two steps of the proof.?

it’s c.

don’t be fooled into thinking ST ≡ TS is symmetric property. ST and TS are different names for the same segment. a claim that the segment is congruent to itself is reflexive property. by contrast, if ST ≡ PQ, then PQ ≡ ST would follow by the symmetric property of congruence. so step 3 is reflexive, step 4 is SSS.

(Get Answer) – Justify the last two steps of the proof. Given and RS… – Given and RS congruent to UT Prove Proof: 1. RS congruent UT Given 2.RT congruent US Given 3ST congruent TS ? 4 Triangle RST congruent with triangle UTS ?8. Supply the missing reasons to complete the proof. correct idea, not well organized correct idea, one or more significant steps omitted. PTS: 1 DIF: L4 REF: 4-7 Using Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles OBJ: 4-7.2 Using Two Pairs of Congruent Triangles STA: CA GEOM 5.0 TOP…Normally by justify it means that at each step of the way you would put a short reason of why you made that move. So for an example It means to produce an "annotated" proof, with indication of the rules of inference used in each step, like the following for, e.g.

4. Justify the last two steps of the proof. – The trials of the last three decades had in a very real sense secured England's Protestant identity. Through a generation of conflict in which the enemy had been foreign, Catholic and dangerous, English people had come to identify their Church and Protestantism, as a cornerstone of their identity.Step-by-step explanation:ST=TS (common side)∆RST is corresponding to∆UTS (by sss). if the mean of the following frequency distribution is 7.2 find the value of k x 2 4 6 8 10 12 f 4 7 10 16 k 3.An explanation of how to write an algebraic proof by justifying each step of the solution for the equation. Review of the Properties of Equality for…

discrete mathematics – Justify each step in the proof sequence… – I am working on a two column manuscript that sometimes requires me to place figures. Some figures are placed at the bottom of a page. However, when I break the paragraph mid-sentence the last line ends left justified. How can I fully justify the last line?9 4. Justify the last two steps of the proof. Reflexive Prop of ≌ SSS 4-2. 10 5. Name the angle included by the sides and . ∠P ∠N ∠M none of these 4-2. 15 7. What is the missing reason in the two-column proof? D. ASA Postulate Non-Response Grid ASA Postulate 4-3.Justify the last two steps of the proof.